Prepare documents for review.

Capture invoice data and make discrepancies visible.

Illustrative use case, not a completed client engagement.

The starting point

Accounting data is typed from PDFs or scans. Missing purchase order numbers and mismatched amounts are only spotted later.

A possible workflow

DocumentExtractionValidationAccounting review

Relevant fields are extracted and checked against existing records. Uncertain values and mismatches enter a review queue. This example does not include automatic payments.

What we would measure in a pilot

Accuracy per data field, review time and the proportion of documents with exceptions.

Include these exceptions in testing

  • Poorly readable or multi-page documents
  • Different currency or missing purchase order number
  • Duplicate documents

Keep the decision traceable

For each test case, define what counts as correct and when the system should abstain. The reviewer sees the input, proposal and available supporting information together. Corrections are assessed before further steps are automated. A high success rate alone is not enough: the types of errors and their consequences matter too.

Prerequisites

Suitable sample data, available interfaces and an owner for subject-matter review. Actual integrations are determined after reviewing your systems.

Which process takes too much of your team’s time?

Tell us about it. Together, we can find a concrete starting point.

Discuss a project